“Would a
swallow choose a fish that doesn’t bite a hundred seeking maggots,
or a fish that
bites the only maggot chasing it?”
True
to the complex system of mate selection, women and men come from worlds apart in
consideration to their ultimate decision-making in picking out members of the
opposite sex. In truth, very few men in
percentage terms do the choosing per se.
They, in the main, do the instigating and chasing, but that is different
to the choosing. What men actually do is
pro-act with a woman for her to then make the choice to whether he is suitable
for her.
Of
course there are a minority of men who can select the woman they want. Take a young famous sports star for
example. There will be far more women
seeking him than there are women he can simultaneously deal with. This whole supply and demand process plays
right into his hands. To a lesser
magnitude, a man sitting as a high executive in a corporation with many female
workers also has the dilemma of choices, although his likely older age (40+)
and family baggage – in likelihood of losing his wife, kids and finances -
perhaps doesn’t allow him to take full advantage of the apparent luxuries. Men of extreme blessed physical
attractiveness – with no high level of fame, status or wealth to accompany -
will have an array of female admirers, but this rarely transcends back into an
abundance of choices with these women for long term relationships. A man in this position will have to settle
for satisfying some of those willing in shorter flings, isolated opportunities
with women confident enough to date him, or be happy with what the single life
offers in comparison to the restrictions he sees for himself that are put upon
his married male friends.
But
as this blog is far more interested in the 99%+ of regular people out there
(yes ladies, even those of you who think you’re above and beyond are exactly in
this bracket), I will disregard the celebrity and fame element in preference of
focusing on the real world. Good for
those who do live in the bubble I allude to, but it will catch up with them one
day too.
First,
we start with the men. This is a simple
process:
Male Selection Process
|
|||
Do I find her physically attractive?
If yes, do I like her personality?
If no, pursue & use for sexual enjoyment / hope things
improve
If yes, could I see her as girlfriend material
If yes to all the above, venture onto
potential LTR
|
Yes
Yes
?
Yes
|
No,
No
?
No
|
Now we take a
look at how women view the same process:
Female Selection Process
|
|||
Do I find him physically attractive?
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
If no, do I find him repulsive looking?
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
If repulsive, does he have other desirables in huge amounts?
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
If no, dismiss. If
yes, venture on & hope the most
If “no” to repulsive, does he have other desirable metrics?
If no, dismiss unless I believe I can do no better
If yes to above question, venture onto potential
LTR
If yes to Q1, is he less or more physically attractive than
me?
If less eye catching, does he have other desirable metrics?
If no, short term fling or venture until better option arrives
If yes, venture onto potential LTR
If more physically attractive, does he have other desirables?
If no, dismiss
If yes, are these desirables mainly status, wealth &
attitude?
If no, dismiss
If yes, can my ego cope with him being more eye-catching?
If no, reluctantly dismiss
If yes, reluctantly accept & hope discomfort
eases over time
|
Yes
Yes
Yes
Less
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
|
No,
No
No,
More
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
|
The length of the table for each gender assessment tells its own story. The female Q&A’s are almost 4 times greater than the male equivalent. This is just an abbreviated version too, because it would be fair to say many women would lay down questions related to personality, reliability and commitment - to mention only three. Naturally, the answers are dictated by the quality and selectiveness of the appropriate candidate. A woman who requires boyfriend validation in her life is far more likely to find a partner by asking less questions than a career orientated “girls-girl”. In the former case, her default need to be constantly alongside a man manifests in being less picky. In the case of the latter, she will have higher bars for him to jump over even though her lure to find a man will be equally as strong. Now this may just be a simple devised table produced by a simple guy like me, but let it be said that this is how nearly every woman and man thinks when contemplating a liaison with one so beautiful or not.
Simply
concluded:
A
man will desire sexual attraction when looking at a woman (or in low calibre
male cases, enough to establish a sexual arousal), and anything above that is
only relevant when he considers the longer haul. There are thousands of men out there with
head turning women where she can barely articulate a sensible sentence, so even
the need for female endearing personality is limited to an extent.
Women
need to consider far more elements when assessing future mates from the
opposite sex. Like men, they start with
the visuals, but their minds quickly and significantly surpass the first view
thoughts. You will notice 4 red stages that illustrate
the point of finding someone for potential long term relationship material:
The
first stage is a man she is repulsed with but who offers enormous motivations
in the form of wealth and status. If
he’s a great guy too, well I’m sure this alone will make up for his big beer
gut and droopy man tits.
The
second red stage will be when she finds her typical average looking man who is
a decent run of the mill guy. Lower
quality or short in confidence women will be happy to have a man from these questions
alone, and they offer much more leeway due to sparse options in the field. More selective women will sometimes take on a
man who doesn’t sexually turn her on because of the other components he can
supply as a male partner in his entirety.
The
third stage is most women’s ideal scenario.
She has an immediate visceral predilection for his look, but he isn’t as
physically attractive as she is. If he
doesn’t offer much more beyond the visuals, this is typical of a rugged looking
bad boy alongside a very cute or hot woman.
She benefits from his popularity, social status and comparative inferior
physical features. It’s short term gain
with perhaps longer term pain. But when
a man offers a woman intimate projected attraction and an array of other
metrics, yet he is still that ideal 10% to 15% less striking to the eye than
her relativity, he’s what is called in the sexual market as a woman’s dream
ticket. She gains the lot – all the
attributes he can offer without damaging her ego.
This
leads nicely onto the last way she can find “happiness”. Nearly every woman doesn’t take comfort in
being with a man who is more physically attractive than her, but there is still
a minority percentage (15% to 20%) of the female society who will not
necessarily dismiss him on this factor alone.
However, to compensate for this irritable feeling she possesses, a man
of high aesthetic value will be in a far better bargaining position when he
throws other items on the table that women like. Even this isn’t always enough with many
women, but if he is high scale in personality, charisma, status and wealth, he
consequently now has many of those women who were once willing in admiration
but reluctant in acceptance leaning towards his appeal. From my personal experience, I would estimate
this pre-conceived rejection percentage to fall from 85% to 50% if the woman
looking on sees something in it for herself.
So
there you have it. Once again it shows
how much harder it is for a man to satisfy a woman in respect to the
inverse. But in all fairness, men only
have themselves to blame for this predicament, because if less men acted so
supplicated, giving and passive, fewer women would get to the exert the
breadths and depths of this selection criteria.
It would all filter down to devise a happier sexual marketplace. Though women are loathed to admit it, they
long for a man who actually validates them.
It makes them try harder to please him, and it is full proof of his value
to the world of possessed options.
This non-supplicated manner doesn’t always need to be in the form of options with women too. A man can illustrate his diversity of interests in life, and the woman he is with must fight for his time and attention. Ultimately, the female mind has more positive emotions when seeking acceptance is predominant in a timescale of the relationship or interaction with a man. Only intermittently does a woman require her man to feel worthy to be with her.
This non-supplicated manner doesn’t always need to be in the form of options with women too. A man can illustrate his diversity of interests in life, and the woman he is with must fight for his time and attention. Ultimately, the female mind has more positive emotions when seeking acceptance is predominant in a timescale of the relationship or interaction with a man. Only intermittently does a woman require her man to feel worthy to be with her.
Good post. While I may quibble with some parts, your selection process provides a good visual illustration of the differences between male and female mate selection.
ReplyDeleteWhy do these things never have thumbs down? This article is corrosive to the human brain. It is insanity... It's people who think like this, that desirable people stay away from.
ReplyDeleteReally, well you keep telling yourself that...
DeleteOne thing though, it's no coincidence how you don't actually pinpoint one item that is "corrosive", and you just do the usual generic criticism.
How can reality (and I assume you do agree that this is how women and men use a selection process) be harmful to the human brain?