“A good thing
in small doses is worth a bad thing in large doses.”
This
3 minute video from a few years ago will tell you everything you need to know
about modern day western world culture, and the general human behaviour that
goes hand in hand. In the timeframe from
then and now, these dynamics have only compounded further.
At
the risk of being pedantic, I don’t think it is at the Arthur Ashe Stadium in
Flushing Meadows, New York. Is it even
one of the smaller courts at the US Open?
Maybe, but the small points are irrelevant to whether it is filmed at a
tennis, baseball, soccer or tiddly-winks match.
The point is in the people within.
With
respect, the United States of America would be most prominent of viewings to
this kind over other countries on the globe, but you could just as likely
see similar instances in Canada, the United Kingdom or Australia. It may just be that bit less obvious and infrequent
in these nations.
We
don’t know what the drunk younger man had been doing or saying to piss people
off prior to the filming, but I suspect it couldn’t have been too untoward
otherwise he would have been escorted out by that time. A bit loud and full of obscenities, possibly,
but nothing like placing anybody’s life at risk.
At
0:09, the woman commits the first offence in slapping him across the face with
full force. Why should she get away
scott free with that? I thought women
had fought hard for equality, so where’s the equality and consistency
here? Basically, equality in a female’s
mind is totally biased and one sided. If
it suits her then great, if not, it doesn’t apply. Had he slapped her, anywhere on her
unappealing anatomy, heaven knows what would have happened to him in terms of
reprimanding consequences.
From
0:20, the drunk guy explains, with full justification, the right he has to be
there. He had every reason to defend
himself against a do-gooder who likely couldn’t tolerate his language. I’m not defending people who constantly
swear, far from it in fact, but it doesn’t give her the right to slap him
across the face.
At
1:32, I couldn’t quite understand his words, but it rattled the old man. My guess is the old man is the older “lover”
partner of the unattractive and overweight woman. Was it offensive against her, again maybe so,
but the old man creates the bigger crime of violent conduct. You can’t just take it into your own
hands. Had the old man broke his back when
the two of them fell a row down, then he would have received my deepest
sympathies, but it wouldn’t cloud my belief and rightful view in the
objectivity that any injury, fracture or future disability he could have
incurred was anyone’s fault but his own.
From
1:40 to the end, this is what makes me vomit more than anything else. We live in a society where >90% of men
(and people generally) performing the role of being lapdogs, do-gooders,
whistle blowers and suck-ups who are more interested in being a follower of the
crowd, irrespective to the facts, than to say it how it is and, in turn, focus
on reality.
Now
I’m not for a moment advocating that men should replicate the actions as seen
from the drunk guy. For one, getting
drunk and acting loud is a symbol of self-control deficiency. Second, he sways over and above the required
firm but calm demeanour, and onto borderline aggressiveness. Third, he could smirk a bit more - in showing
the woman it means nothing but a crap to him.
To me, he allows her, and others in the vicinity, to believe her presence
and interruption means that bit too much to him.
But
what he does well, which has to be admired and applauded, is to stand up to
someone who doesn’t like him. I further
compliment him in ignoring all the armchair enthusiasts within a 10 metre
radius who hide behind their gutless comments like a kid wrapped behind the
curtains when their dad raises his voice.
As he says, he doesn’t give a flying duck what anyone wants (or thinks
of him), and this is the attitude I like.
So
as he does his thing, a few hundred weak men, with bored wives or girlfriends
next to them, shout the “get him out”, “a bum”, “call security”, or “go home”
comments. Nice work, chaps! I bet this gutless and politically correct
approach really gets your female partners wet in the knickers….not.
Spot
the norm
You’ll
notice in the video a quite cute blonde girl in the red tank top and short
skirt. Her boyfriend is the typical 15%
less physically attractive comparison to her, and his unchallenging character
is illustrated, epitomized and proven by his bizarre choice to record the
incident. She acts as if the drunk guy
is such an outlandish jerk, and she probably tells people, her boyfriend, and
herself that he is the last man on earth she would be with. I’d hedge a fair bet that given the chance
with the so-called drunk jerk – bearing in mind he is on the same looks level
as her boyfriend – she would drop her panties for something more wrong.
For
the record, had I been there with a girlfriend and she asked for my view, I would
have told her exactly and honestly what I thought. That is: he was acting too loud for my
liking, whilst lacking any calmness that is accustomed with the top quality
men, but at the end of the day he had far less to be guilty about than the fat
woman and old man. I’d have also told
her about my disgust of all the male onlookers, and their weak, pitiful ways. If she doesn’t like my view, I’m not asking
for or seeking her approval. All she
needs to do is drop her knickers, not get pregnant, and give me the easiest
life possible.
Q-tip:
Men who follow the rules,
when it belongs to attempts in feeding women’s egos and making them feel better
about life, are the men who women are repulsed by the most. Men who stand up to the norm, within the
parameters of legality and respect (although men who jump over this level are
still more attractive to women than men who are predictable and boring), are
the men who women admire and love the most.
I’m
off for a long vacation to America and Canada in a couple of weeks’ time. The first time I visited North America was in
2008, and I had no idea of game, the red pill, or female emotional
psychology. The same could be applied
the following year in California and Nevada, although trends were starting to
emerge. By winter 2013, I had written a
manuscript on the subject prior to starting the blog, but even then I still had
a fair bit to learn. Three and a half
years later, and it all seems so easy to understand...
I hope you're not coming to Canada or US to pick-up. Canada is a lovely left-wing hell of feminist entitlement. You'll only feed the women's egos...
ReplyDeleteJust read this to give you a heads-up:
http://tomenunite.blogspot.ca/
I just ran across your blog. Really enjoying the content.
ReplyDeleteI agree 100% with your view of men in Western society; they have been feminized, and turned into "lapdogs" as you say. And the irony is, despite the fact women always say they want guys to be more "sensitive", most women hold these type of men in contempt (though they seem to lack the introspection to realize that is the men's feminization that they are condemning) and are extremely unhappy with them. And the more "feminized" the guy, the more unhappy and unbalance he is. What a mess! The modern feminist movement has created a bunch of unhappy individuals; this is always the result when biology is denied and ignored.
What's even scarier is I don't see any light at the end of the tunnel. It seems like it is going to get much worse before people finally wake up and start rebuilding a normal, functioning society from the wreckage of our current dysfunctional, irrational society.
Quality comments, mate. That good I've even just published a post in relation to it...
Deletelol . . if you think a man could have acted like this in a family centred public space, back in the day, then you need to watch a few black and white movies. The young guy would probably have been taken out and served a good beating by the other young men and their fathers. People wouldn't be passively onlooking as a young man threatens an elder woman. Be he justified or not.
ReplyDeleteToday's society is not politically correct, I'd say it's culturally and morally bereft. There are no common standards that we all agree to abide by and collectively enforce, if flouted. I saw no "political correctness" here, just a load of alienated adults of all ages with not single one with the skills to de-escalate and quash a silly dispute between three immature arseholes.