“As much as you try and control your
life, life remotes it for you.”
across this comment when searching for a song (this song is nothing other than
a running joke of music theme my former boss and I consistently go through)
which stood out in terms of amusement, genuine sympathy, and further
reinforcement to what I have known for years.
A past comment that never leaves my mind
One of the
OG writers regarding female emotional psychology once came out with a phrase
which will stay with me until my dying day or the day I enter dementia,
whichever arrives first. Do not hold me
to the exact words, but his phrase was pretty much:
“Men are the real romantics. Women are the opportunists.”
At that exact moment, I had to digest the words to establish precisely what he meant. Bearing in mind I was much younger than said writer, in addition to only starting my journey on this line of subject, it took me a little longer back then in comparison to what is second nature today. Nevertheless, even then it did not take me more than a few moments – as a manufacture of life experience and general observation – to break the words down in unreservedly comprehending what he meant. In essence, the words are categorically accurate to the real world. Conversely, In societal belief and propaganda, the words are absolutely what members of the politically correct society do not want a man to believe are true and real in practice.
politically correct way to drip feed this concept would be one of this kind:
“Women are romantics. Men need to do much more to be romantic and live up to women’s romantic standards.”
Has it always been this way?
answer to this question is, no, it was most certainly not always this way. When men were real men, and women were much
nicer, not fake, and far more sincere than they are now (think of your grandparents’
era, or parents if they sat in such generation), the roles were much
were hard, and resistant to show any weakness. Women were vulnerable and
were masculine, concurrent to women being feminine. Women were respectful (and often afraid, in
perhaps a healthy way of trepidation) towards men, and men took control of
their female partners’ conduct.
ridiculed and talked down (which I did not like to see) to women, and a woman
would not say boo to a goose in the face of her man in fear of the consequences
which would come her way.
· Far fewer women would be unfaithful to their boyfriends and husbands than the inverse.
this to today’s world, which has been escalating steadily in trend over the
last few decades and prior.
much larger percentage (maybe even the majority of men below the age of forty)
are soft, weak, and passive, whilst a much greater number of women have become
dominant, unlikeable, and over-expectant.
average level of man has become much more feminine, whilst the mean level of
woman is now much more masculine.
men fear arguing, talking back, or putting a woman in her place, yet women have
gone the reverse way in ridiculing and criticizing men – often in front of
other watching people.
· As many, if not more, women are now unfaithful to their male partners in relation to men performing the likewise infidelity.
With the above in mind (granted this is a generalization as opposed to the entirety), it is little wonder why you see what you see today. In easy summary, men have become afraid of women, simultaneous to women being far less respectful towards men.
A word on the commenter
As I stated within the introduction, I actually sympathize with the commenter. At 33, you would like to think he has enough years of experience with both women and life in order to not get apparently down about being alone. Sure, he attempts to place perspective at the end of his comment, but he is not fooling me. He is clearly a little more desperate to meet a woman than his concluding perspective will fool others.
You would like to think he has seen the ups and downs of life, and most importantly that he has realized being without a woman brings about as many (and in reality, more) positives than it does negatives. I do not for a single second think he has thought about it like that.
Unfortunately, his language strikes me as the perennial man who has travelled through a naïve and uneducated (in the education and comprehension of women) life in understanding how it might actually not be quite as bad as he believes it to be should he not locate his female soulmate. He comes across as a bit too trusting of women, rather than being on guard to the realities of what might happen if wise choices are not put in place.
And in a strong way, his words epitomize the whole reasoning behind this post. His words illustrate and emphasize a man who romanticizes in love, finding his soulmate, and living happily ever after. His words further reflect, to me, a man who has not spent much time fully digesting all the unhappy couples out there, irrespective of those who have already split up. If he has not analysed it in this respect, there is no chance he has evaluated the reasons why so many couples are unhappy together or have parted ways.
So, who are the romantics?
This then begs the question, who are the true romantics, and if it is in fact men, and not women, what role do women play in the whole romantic bubble? Allow me to elaborate…
My view is that, as time has changed and evolved, women have become far less into the organic thought and practice of loving a man with sincere, natural and unconditional emotion, and instead have progressively placed a priority (even if often more subconscious than conscious playing out) on how they will feel about themselves when being with a man, in addition to how he can improve her life. Life for women from many decades or centuries ago was always about survival first and foremost, therefore an argument could be made that things have not changed in this respect, but in today’s world it is a much more contrived strategy to get there. My inclination tells me that, way back when, women just strived to find a man and run with the ball, so to speak. There was not as much calculation beforehand.
Consequently, women have become less romantic in terms of the thought of loving a man before any prior motive. This is where the OG writer is coming from. Love, or the genuine inclination to love a man based on uncontrollable biology, is far less common. Opportunism – and providing a more financially secure and status whoring life for herself – is far, far more common, to the point where it is now majority cases in the western world.
As a further consequence then, it is a fair point to put forward that because women have become less romantic, men have evolved to be more romantic. It is almost like a changing of the guard in romantic thresholds, yet strangely the depth of the ocean is the same. Whilst women have droughted the romantic sea level, men have pissed in it to maintain a similar topography.
Q-tip: Society in the western world is designed to brainwash men (and women) into believing that women should be provided with the best life a man can provide for them. We are manipulated into thinking men should do everything that is required to get that respective woman to her destination.