tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1136566595965586346.post4410934951418399476..comments2024-03-16T15:29:13.544+01:00Comments on Women's choices: men's divorces : Never be her last resortVi Nayhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13032920019978546878noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1136566595965586346.post-7065376403697429232023-03-09T09:38:12.441+01:002023-03-09T09:38:12.441+01:00All right, I’ll be waiting for your post. Thanks V...All right, I’ll be waiting for your post. Thanks Vinay. Adriannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1136566595965586346.post-69457581349067789132023-03-08T15:26:39.055+01:002023-03-08T15:26:39.055+01:00Hi mate. Thanks, and hope you are well.
Definitel...Hi mate. Thanks, and hope you are well.<br /><br />Definitely, if you amalgamate female peak physical beauty with a feminist (or just arrogant and self-expectant) mentality, then the ingredients are there to cook up a recipe that is known as one horrible woman - in personality, self-conduct terms, and approachable terms. Add on the masses of men who kiss these women's asses, and men who dare not stand up to them, and this is all compounded further to bring about one awful predicament.<br /><br />As for a 10/10 question, at the risk of upsetting you, this is not Chris Hemsworth in my view. He is a 9/10 imo. I would say I peaked at 8.5/10, although to be fair a few years on and I am still hanging on in there (although definitely no higher than 8.5/10). There are more physically attractive famous men out there than Hemsworth, imo. I will publish a post next week which illustrates two men who are (again, imo). <br /><br />Btw, you pick up on a good point about the 6ft 3" (don't worry, I also work in imperial in this respect) thing. I have definitely written on this subject in the past. For me, the ideal male height (providing said man body defines to suit his height) is 6ft 1 1/2". If I am being pedantic, you could round up to 6ft 2". The reason I say 6ft 1 1/2 is because I am undecided whether 6ft 1" or 6ft 2" is the better option, but it is negligible in the whole scheme of things. It is a somewhat misconception that the taller the man is, the better. This is obviously not true, otherwise every man would like to be 7ft tall. There is naturally a sweet spot, and I stick to the 6ft 1 1/2" opinion.Vi Nayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13032920019978546878noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1136566595965586346.post-63961055887113952952023-03-06T08:52:29.124+01:002023-03-06T08:52:29.124+01:00Hey Vinay, great post. I wanted to ask you if you ...Hey Vinay, great post. I wanted to ask you if you think that this "strong, independent” and “just exercising my options” feminist way of thinking during their peak years leads to women having this exact situation you talked about in this post. But also, I was curious, what would you say is a 10/10 man in physical attractiveness? Would it be Chris Hemsworth at his peak? And how would you rate compared to him? He’s a 6"3’ or 1.90 meters tall (since I know you live in the UK) guy, and I haven’t seen a guy better looking than him. Even among his Avengers costars who are good looking, too. He is the one that stands out. Thanks Vinay.Adriannoreply@blogger.com